Top global sports brands adidas and Mizuno shamefully defy international standards on workers’ rights in Indonesia

published 29-09-2017 12:50, last modified 12-10-2017 17:47
Clean Clothes Campaign issues the following statement in response to the refusal of adidas and Mizuno to pay what is owed to workers who made their shoes in Indonesia:
 Top global sports brands adidas and Mizuno shamefully defy international standards on workers’ rights in Indonesia

Former PT PDK workers protesting in July 2017

Sports’ brands adidas and Mizuno, as major buyers to the Panarub Dwikarya Benoa (PDK) factory in Indonesia in 2012, should finally ensure that 345 former workers receive the severance payments they are rightfully owed. In continuing to refuse to take responsibility adidas and Mizuno are directly violating international human rights norms and standards.

The international standards could not be clearer. The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights state that it is the responsibility of international operating companies to ensure that human rights are respected in their supply chains, through active prevention and mitigation of adverse human rights impacts. This responsibility is independent of the actions of states and even applies if the company’s contribution to the impact was indirect. The long-standing relationship between adidas and Mizuno as leading buyers of the PDK factory, as well as the group the factory belongs to, is an indisputable fact. Both brands therefore had a clear responsibility to prevent, address, and mitigate the labour situation at the PDK factory well before and after the strike in July 2012.

For years prior to the 2012 strike, the workers at the PDK factory, most of them women, experienced abusive and unlawful working conditions. Some women onlyan hour, far below the minimum wage in Indonesia. In January 2012, to ensure that increased production targets of hundreds of shoes an hour were met, factory management intensified the verbal and physical abuse against the women workers and deprived them of time to eat, drink water or go to the toilet. In February 2012, the workers decided to form a new union to address these issues.

In July 2012 the PDK workers decided to protest the poor working conditions and low wages by going on strike, an unequivocal right under international human rights norms. The striking workers were first met with police violence and management intimidation, and eventually 1300 workers were fired. All of the incidents described clearly violate a vast array of international human rights principles and this was affirmed in a. Therefore, it bears repeating, both adidas and Mizuno have an unmitigated and unequivocal responsibility to ensure that the workers receive just remedy and this responsibility will not be met until the 345 workers who are still fighting for justice receive the compensation that they are owed.

The fact that adidas may have severed their relationship with the PDK factory at the time of the strike is both irrelevant and troubling in itself. Adidas shoes were produced at the factory until at least May 2012. Therefore adidas was present at the factory during the many years of wage and labour rights’ violations, which eventually gave rise to the workers’ strike. As a consistent major buyer to the factory group that owned the PDK factory, adidas had the knowledge and means to use significant leverage to change the situation at the PDK factory before the strike and then later even after having ended the relationship.

Further, in the face of human rights violations in supply chains, it is essential for brands to stay and work to fix the problems in garment factories rather than leave. The ‘race to the bottom’ business strategy in the garment industry is characterized by unequal and insecure relationships between global buyers and local suppliers, which incentivizes factories to cut corners to remain competitive. Instead of building a sustainable relationship in which labour rights’ violations could have been addressed, adidas did absolutely nothing to help the workers which could have helped to prevent the strike. In this particular case adidas is relying on their cut and run strategy as a defense, a strategy that likely gave rise to the abusive conditions at the factory in the first place.

Mizuno and adidas’ actions in relation to the former PDK workers remain woefully inadequate. It has become increasingly clear that these brands are biding time waiting for the workers to give up their fight and for the international community to lose interest. They are playing the blame game instead of admitting that these workers in their supply chain have been wronged and that those who profit most from these workers’ labour should take the eventual responsibility. Their inaction is inexplicable given that the combined yearly earnings of these two global brands well surpasses a billion dollars.

The 345 ex-PDK factory workers continue to pay the price every day. Some of them were placed on a black list, making it impossible to find permanent employment. Workers’ children had to leave school and other families became homeless, no longer able to afford rent.

The UN Forum on Business and Human Rights, taking place in November 2017, will address the central theme of “Realizing access to effective remedy”. The former PDK workers are an excellent example of the fact that such access is not self-evident and often absent. Clean Clothes Campaign remains committed to continue to support these workers in their campaign for justice.

 

Find adidas' earlier refusal .

 

See also
Open letter: After five years, it is high time to pay severance to 345 workers who made adidas and Mizuno shoes Open letter: After five years, it is high time to pay severance to 345 workers who made adidas and Mizuno shoes

Today five years ago, a group of Indonesian workers started a strike after their employer had ...

M&S, Bonmarché and Nygård should compensate Cambodian workers after factory closure M&S, Bonmarché and Nygård should compensate Cambodian workers after factory closure

The sudden closure of a garment factory linked to UK and Canadian brands has left 208 workers in ...

German brands s.Oliver and Gerry Weber targeted by protesters in Indonesia German brands s.Oliver and Gerry Weber targeted by protesters in Indonesia

Two Indonesian trade unions organised a protest in front of the German Embassy in Jakarta today (30 ...

Activists demand UNIQLO pay workers what they are due Activists demand UNIQLO pay workers what they are due

On International Women's Day a coalition of global campaigners are organising a series of actions ...

Chinese Labour Rights activists still in prison Chinese Labour Rights activists still in prison

We are calling for the release of Meng Han, Labour Rights Activist who was imprisoned by the ...

What happened to the workers in Indonesia? What happened to the workers in Indonesia?

Read the insights about the 346 women and men in Indonesia demanding fair compensation from ...

Mizuno denies support to unfairly dismissed Indonesian workers

Japanese sports brand Mizuno, celebrating its 110th anniversary this year, continues to refuse to ...

Sector Wide Solutions (Bahasa Indonesia)

Indonesian version of the Sector Wide Solution (revised version 2009).

We are not machines: Indonesian Nike and adidas workers

Despite some small steps forward, poverty and fear still dominate the lives of Nike and Adidas ...

UNIQLO under fire for factory closure after worker uprising UNIQLO under fire for factory closure after worker uprising

UNIQLO, one of Asia's biggest fashion brands, has come under fire this month after one of its ...